Did She Talk to Her God First?

2009 July 4

I know its not real.  It doesnt have to be real to be funny; just like god/dog.

I know it's not real. It doesn't have to be real to be funny; just like god/dog.

You might of heard that Sarah Palin has decided to not run for reelection, even deciding to step-down as governor of Alaska before her first term is up.  What does Sarah Palin have planned?  Does she have a position at Fox News?  Does she have a reality TV show coming?  We’ll have to wait and see.

Joe the Plumber, or Joe Six-pack, or Joe Dumbass also decided that he wasn’t going to run for public office in 2010.  He said that he asked god, “and he was like, No.”  Now, Sarah Palin is a Right Wing Religious Nutjob herself; did she, too, consult with god/dog and get the “No,” signal?  You know, maybe it started raining, or maybe in the clouds god/dog spelled out the word “No.”  Whatever it was, it seems she got the message pretty clearly.  Doesn’t she seem a little frazzled in this speech?

more about “Sarah Palin Resignation Speech: FULL …“, posted with vodpod

God/Dog bless her, she’s still crazy as a loon.  Notice the part where she emphasizes the “real ‘climate change’?”  ’Silly seculars, climate change can’t exist because god didn’t put it in genesis.’  Oh…., that makes a lot of sense.  I think I need to read the Left Behind series, just so I can make fun of it more.

14 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 July 8

    You didn’t “imply” shit, you said I depicted “Palin as a redneck.” Also, the caption under the photo says that it isn’t real. Did you seriously say that making fun of Sarah Palin is worse than racism? Sarah Palin is a joke because people like you are supporting her. If she had no support, then she nor her fans would be made fun of.

    Whether it’s a misnomer or not, the words are still loaded and are still considered racially abusive. What the hell is a bleeding heart liberal? I served in the military for six years. Everyone’s heart has blood pumping through it, so what is that suppose to mean? Does it mean, ‘people that care about things you don’t’ or does it mean ‘ people that care about things that I disagree with?’ Are you a Christian? Isn’t your Jesus H. Christ a bleeding heart liberal?

    • 2009 July 13
      michaelhill permalink

      Do you have a deficit when it comes to language? “Imply” is synonymous with the word “suggest”.
      Nappy is a solitary word – tomes of hatred towards a woman you have never met is far worse. Suppose I use one word labeling you an asshole and another writes numerous explicit posts labeling you a flaming homosexual – which is worse when it comes to character defamation?
      You, of course, will side against me in an attempt to prove your meaningless point while asserting your opinion that GAY is OK. Then again, you probably are.

      What does H. stand for? I assume you believe in nothing – EVERYTHING, including your life, is mere happenstance? Who fired the first atom to start it all in motion? No one? Don’t you question that?

      Jesus as a bleeding heart liberal…. He was actually quite conservative but wanted to give everyone the opportunity to redeem themselves. He showed his mercy in that regard. He was not aligned with the sheepish bleeding heart liberals of modern times as he had a standard one had to meet for his mercy.
      As to how you define “bleeding heart” – that’s up to you. “People that care about things you don’t” or “people that care about things that I disagree with” fits your creedo as well as it does the next guy’s.

      Go ahead and feel righteous in whatever way you want. However, you and your liberal ilk would give away the USA because it would make you feel good. At the same time you would step aside while someone burns a US flag or buggered an intern in the halls of a senate building because it makes them feel good. You approve of the inordinate spending of BHO and don’t mind the aspect of a future tax rate near or over 50%.

      I am in favor of legalizing marijuana – a shock, correct? I like to catch a buzz now and then. I chill out and try to forget the petty shit you get spun up over.

      • 2009 July 13

        You misunderstand, I’m having fun. Again, you didn’t imply or “suggest” anything; you directly stated it. Yes, it is OK to be homosexual and I’d rather be called homosexual than an asshole.

        I’m sure in your world, Jesus was a conservative (psst, he didn’t really like helping the poor) and he also spoke English, that’s why the Bible is written in English.

        Who cares that you want to legalize marijuana, so you’re also selfish and are willing to turn cheek on conservative standards that you don’t agree with but still hold the party line. You’re not going to win any brownie points because you get high. Besides, I’m in California; everyone and their mother gets high.

        You got one thing right, I don’t mind the prospect of a future tax rate over 50%. Especially, capital gains taxes. Check out the tax during Reagan’s time, it was 65%. I’d like it even better if they dropped taxes on labor all together and raised the capital gains tax to over 80%. Making money off of money shouldn’t be taxed the same as money made from labor and hard work.

        • 2009 July 13
          michaelhill permalink

          I’m through with this. Remove the implication splinter from your finger and stab yourself with a knife labeled accuse. I accuse you for whatever stick you broke off in your ass and can’t remove.
          You are a hopeless fuck wanting to counter whatever another says in the name of fun no matter how it makes you look in the end. Does asshole suit you?
          Is there ever an entire room of like asinine fag lovers that sit around and agree with you? Gee, it must be disgusting at some point.

          Your view on taxes is distorted. Income taxes were never at 65% in this country. You must have lived in the UK. If taxes rise they will surely come from the pockets of the common man as the wealthy are not going to surrender their cash as easily as you suppose. That’s why they retain attorneys.

          • 2009 July 13

            Through with what? Thinking? It’s like a muscle, … if you never use it…

            You can call me whatever you want. I can call you whatever I want. I think I’ll go with bigot. That rounds thing out pretty nicely. Now, you’ll excuse me while I go hang out with my “fag” friends and talk about liberal conspiracies.

  2. 2009 July 4

    Did you really say “nappy” when describing Obama’s children. Wow. you’re an immature racist aren’t you? Secondly, Bill never molested anyone; oh, he slept around but I don’t care about that.

    • 2009 July 6
      michaelhill permalink

      Yep, I did write “nappy”. Is it any worse than depicting Palin as a redneck in a bikini with a gun in her hand? How about dragging her son or daughter across the pages of every newspaper or network news desk? The media continually depicted Palin as the spoof character played by Tina Fey in SNL skits. People actually thought Palin said what Fey did in those skits. You liberals rode her ass like a mule in a coal mine with no thought of what you were doing. When someone points it out and makes a point of it you cry foul.
      Immature racist? Hardly.
      Realistic observer? Yes.
      Do you not like the way the shoe fits?
      Bill groped women who didn’t ask for it. Do some research. As far as him sleeping around – that’s OK with liberals as they claim to be tolerant of anything as long as it makes them feel good for the moment. What if he “slept” with your wife? Would you still not care?
      The whole thing boils down to the fact the liberal faction of this country, which drives the mindset of the world, has succeeded in asserting guilt upon any that aren’t with their program. Those that claim to be politically correct are not.

      • 2009 July 6

        “Nappy” is a racial slur, redneck is a not. Also, I didn’t call her a redneck, it’s interesting that you got that idea though. It only shows that you’re not really reading anything, you’re simply getting angry with someone because they are bagging on Sarah Palin. You probably know less about her than I do, but you’re willing to follow along with whatever she says or does. Sarah Palin is a scourge on American politics. Not a frightening monster but an annoyance who offers up endless bits of insane chatter. She has no place in politics, she should go work for the 700 Club.

        • 2009 July 8
          michaelhill permalink

          If you took the time to read my writing you might note I implied you depict Palin as a redneck.
          You, probably a liberal bleeding heart, look too deeply into anything for the negative. You claim “nappy” to be a racial slur yet you continue to pile crap on Palin for reason other than for your own entertainment. I think that to be worse than racist.
          For what it’s worth – the term “racist” is a misnomer. We are all of one race – human. Plants and animals are qualified by species type.
          Humans may vary in appearance but there we are all of one race. May the Godless Americans haven’t come to terms with that as of yet.

  3. 2009 July 4
    michaelhill permalink

    I have seen and read some utter bullshit concerning conservatism, the Republican party and Ms. Palin over the past couple of years but none seem as self serving as the crap I have seen here.
    The ideals of “Left Agenda” is a scary aspect. Why not socialist communism or anarchy? At that point right of center would taste pretty damned good because the liberal left would have given away everything that makes life worth living in these United States – sample the ever growing shabby conditions existing today.
    I can’t put my finger on which is worse in these times. Is it corporate greed (surely a right of center agenda) or liberal disdain for those in society that may be better off than the slackers and/or “downtrodden” in society who buy lottery tickets rather than put that same money into savings?
    Redistribution of wealth is the left’s rallying cry concerning fiscal healing in the USA. It doesn’t work that way as there are many left of the center who are filthy rich. The Obamas are not simple folk of the land and Al Gore leaves a larger carbon footprint than an average family of four. They are free to open their mouths yet the masses ignore the ivory walls these hypocrites hide behind.
    Could it be Ms. Palin has had enough of the needless public flaying the left has demonstrated in recent years – particularly when it affects her family? She hid nothing from America concerning her family. Her pregnant teenage daughter and handicapped son were front page news as well the butt of too many jokes. How many Americans share the same burdens within their domiciles? The recent tasteless jokes by Letterman were probably enough of a reason to take her family out of the spotlight and live below the radar. I never heard of any such barbs aimed at Barry HO’s two daughters. Those nappy headed darlings are apparently off limits.
    As for what Ms. Palin’s future holds – how much did Bill (the molester) Clinton receive for his memoirs or speaking engagements? How much will Barry (the mulatto) Obama receive for the same? See how easy it is to aim slurs at these individuals?
    Is she not privy to the same fruits of office others reap?
    Is there not a zip lock baggie all liberals can jump into so the rest of us can seal and toss it into a freezer?
    If they could be convinced it is a social program it would be easy.

    • 2009 July 4

      I can’t think of a single politician that ever resigned their post so that they could get to making money faster. She’s showing exactly what’s important to her, not public service, but making money and being in the media. The media did leave her alone but she wouldn’t shut up, much like Sanford now.

      • 2009 July 6
        michaelhill permalink

        Gee, Obama is more of a global media darling than any other president I can think of in history. He is constantly in the spotlight but then again, he is merely an entertainer.
        What is he doing for me? Absolutely nothing.
        Are you really obsessed with Palin’s actions that you must rant on about her? To what end?
        I suggest you give over unless you reside in Alaska and her departure is going to cause you grief.

        • 2009 July 6

          Yeah, people actually like Obama. He’s an intelligent man that speaks in a way that many find inspiring. Palin is also a “media darling” but of the opposite nature. She’s so ridiculous, so unaware of her surroundings, so completely out of touch of anything bordering reality much less Russia that everything she does is hysterical. What’s really funny is when people say she has a chance in 2012, or 2016, or ever at running for President. She won’t even win the primaries. She’s a joke, and I’m just having a good time laughing at her. And her daughter Bristol is taking up the reigns as another crazy girl from Wasilla. If they don’t want the attention, then they can step out of the spot-light, it’s that simple.

          • 2009 July 8
            michaelhill permalink

            Do you find it as easy to trash Palin and her family while bowing a knee to the next to worst president in history? Look back on your post.
            You spent two sentences on Barry HO and your deluded visons of his greatness and then spewed venom to finish the paragraph.
            I doubt you are aware of anything that borders reality. Do you really know what you write of?
            His honor, the president, is more than fair game as he is in the news each and every day with some new way to screw the pooch. If you paid more attention to his actions than to his social appeal you may see the truth.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS